The Undead Constitution

47 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2013  

Michael C. Dorf

Cornell Law School

Date Written: January 1, 2012

Abstract

In what might be regarded as his standard 'stump' speech, Justice Scalia has repeatedly championed what he calls the 'dead Constitution.' The bon mot was and remains a good laugh line, but it has become increasingly inappropriate over the course of the quarter century during which Justice Scalia has been delivering it. When he was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1986, dead constitutionalism, that is to say, originalism, was still a mostly insurgent position within constitutional theory. Since then, and in no small part thanks to Justice Scalia's own influence, originalism has become a leading approach to constitutional interpretation.

Meanwhile, originalism's supposed archenemy, the living Constitution, has never been much more than a placeholder. As Professor David Strauss observes, 'the critics of the idea of a living constitution,' that is to say, originalists, "have pressed their arguments so forcefully that, among people who write about constitutional law, the term 'living constitution' is hardly ever used, except derisively.'

Keywords: dead Constitution, originalism, constitutional interpretation, living Constitution, common law method, interpret

Suggested Citation

Dorf, Michael C., The Undead Constitution (January 1, 2012). Harvard Law Review, Vol. 125, No. 2011, 2012; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-49. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2218496

Michael C. Dorf (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/faculty/bio.cfm?id=333

Paper statistics

Downloads
247
Rank
100,508
Abstract Views
1,265