Triangulating the World Trade Organization

29 Pages Posted: 22 Feb 2013

See all articles by Steve Charnovitz

Steve Charnovitz

George Washington University - Law School

Date Written: 2002

Abstract

This Article presents an analytic method for considering proposals to expand the scope of the WTO. In doing so, the Article organizes competing ideas concerning the rationale for the WTO and shows how varying assumptions can lead to different conclusions on the proper content of international trade law. This Article seeks to advance the debate by comparing these assumptions and also considering the key literature about trade linkage.

The Article proceeds in three parts. Part I shows why the purpose of the WTO is not self-evident and how a framework can be useful for improving the debate about the organization's mission. Part II presents a three-category framework reflecting the different ambits in which the WTO operates: (1) the relationship between states, (2) the relationship between the state and individuals, and (3) the relationship between intergovernmental organizations. Finally, Part III summarizes the analysis and explains how the frames can help triangulate the WTO within international law.

Keywords: World Trade Organization, WTO, international trade law, scope of the WTO, international law, triangulating, GATT, GATS, interstate diplomacy, domestic politics

JEL Classification: F10, K33

Suggested Citation

Charnovitz, Steve, Triangulating the World Trade Organization (2002). 96 American Journal of International Law 28 (2002), GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-13, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2013-13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2221556

Steve Charnovitz (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
78
Abstract Views
704
Rank
618,329
PlumX Metrics