Should Evidence of Settlement Negotiations Affect Attorneys' Fees Awards?

25 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2013 Last revised: 22 Apr 2016

See all articles by Seth Katsuya Endo

Seth Katsuya Endo

University of Florida - Levin College of Law; New York University (NYU)

Date Written: February 20, 2013

Abstract

In October 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a district court erred by reducing a prevailing plaintiff’s requested attorney’s fees based on evidence of settlement negotiations in which the plaintiff rejected a settlement offer that far exceeded what the plaintiff was awarded at trial. This created a circuit split, breaking from the precedent established by the Third Circuit, Fourth Circuit, Seventh Circuit, Eighth Circuit, and Ninth Circuit, all of which have approved a district court’s consideration of such evidence as part of its assessment of the degree of success obtained, which informs whether to adjust an award of attorneys’ fees calculated under the lodestar method.

The article identifies and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of these courts’ analyses, assessing whether evidence of settlement negotiations is inadmissible pursuant to Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the extent to which such evidence is reasonably probative of the amount truly sought by the plaintiff, and the policy ramifications related to either permitting or prohibiting district courts from considering such evidence. The article argues that the First Circuit’s position is problematic because it relies heavily on a non-obvious negative implication of Rule 68 and ignores the empirical research that reveals endemic agency issues in the attorney-client relationship. But the article also contends that, to the extent that the other circuits have adopted a prophylactic rule aimed at discouraging lawyers from counseling their clients against settling in the hopes of accruing additional fees, the better path is to use either monetary sanctions or referrals to state bar agencies upon a procedurally-sound finding of misconduct in specific cases.

Keywords: settlement, settlements, attorney's fees, attorneys' fees, 408, 68, circuit split, Sheppard, Diaz

Suggested Citation

Endo, Seth Katsuya, Should Evidence of Settlement Negotiations Affect Attorneys' Fees Awards? (February 20, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2221697 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2221697

Seth Katsuya Endo (Contact Author)

University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )

PO Box 357069
Gainesville, FL 32635
United States

New York University (NYU) ( email )

Bobst Library, E-resource Acquisitions
20 Cooper Square 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10003-711
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Abstract Views
817
rank
274,617
PlumX Metrics