Palsgraf as 'Transsystemic' Tort Law

Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 243-261, 2012

Posted: 28 Feb 2013

See all articles by Shauna Van Praagh

Shauna Van Praagh

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

This paper revisits the 1928 case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railway in order to illustrate and explore the substance and method of transsystemic law teaching. Grounded in the real comparative pedagogy of the law classroom, the case shows the integration of two approaches to the scope of tort liability. These two approaches, embodied in the judgements of Justices Cardozo and Andrews, map a key structural difference between the tort of negligence in Anglo-Canadian common law and the Quebec civil law of extracontractual obligations. In addition to underscoring the difference between a duty-based approach to delineating liability and one based on proximate cause, the paper insists that both the substance and method of these two legal traditions can be identified, examined, and questioned in the classroom through a fresh reading of an old and classic source, and that the source itself can provoke a fresh understanding of comparative pedagogy and purpose in law.

Suggested Citation

Van Praagh, Shauna, Palsgraf as 'Transsystemic' Tort Law (2012). Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 243-261, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2222933

Shauna Van Praagh (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
711
PlumX Metrics