The 'Overcrowding the Profession' Argument and the Professional Melting Pot

25 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2013 Last revised: 1 Feb 2018

See all articles by Eyal Katvan

Eyal Katvan

College of Law and Business - Ramat Gan Law School

Date Written: February 25, 2013

Abstract

In 2012, fourteen law schools operated in Israel: four within universities and ten at private colleges. The number of law students at colleges and accredited attorneys who graduated from the colleges greatly exceeds the number of university law students and alumnae. There is consensus among the leadership of the Israel Bar that law colleges (the newcomers) are responsible for Israel’s overpopulation of lawyers and for the legal profession’s decline in prestige. Twenty years after the first law colleges were established, the time has come to inquire whether this argument of overcrowding of the profession presents a new ‘discovery’ or rather the recycling of a standard dynamic between professionals and legal education institutions. The present article examines this issue by evaluating several options: is the profession’s ‘over-crowdedness’ argument an attempt to protect the public, an attempt to prevent competition and to elevate status or rather – as has not been previously suggested – is it an artificial argument aimed (perhaps also unconsciously) at creating a professional melting pot?

Suggested Citation

Katvan, Eyal, The 'Overcrowding the Profession' Argument and the Professional Melting Pot (February 25, 2013). International Journal of the Legal Profession, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2224012

Eyal Katvan (Contact Author)

College of Law and Business - Ramat Gan Law School ( email )

26 Ben-Gurion St.
Ramat Gan, 52275
Israel

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
143
PlumX Metrics