Mitigating Incentive Conflicts in Inter-Firm Relationships: Evidence from Long-Term Supply Contracts
46 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2013
Date Written: February 27, 2013
Abstract
Using a sample of long-term supply contracts collected from SEC filings, I show that hold-up concerns and information asymmetry are important determinants of contract design. Asymmetric information between buyers and suppliers leads to shorter term contracts. However, when longer duration contracts facilitate the exchange of relationship specific assets, the parties substitute short-term contracts with financial covenants in order to reduce moral hazard. Covenant restrictions are more prevalent when direct monitoring is costly and the products exchanged are highly specific. Finally, I find that buyers and suppliers are less likely to rely on financial covenants when financial statement reliability is low.
Keywords: Contracting, Covenants, Financial Reporting Quality, Hold-up, Information Asymmetry, Relationship Specific Assets
JEL Classification: D20, D82, G32, L14, L15, L22, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Large-Sample Evidence on the Debt Covenant Hypothesis
By Ilia D. Dichev and Douglas J. Skinner
-
How Does Financing Impact Investment? The Role of Debt Covenants
By Sudheer Chava and Michael R. Roberts