91 Pages Posted: 28 Feb 2013
Date Written: February 28, 2013
International commercial arbitration has long been considered one of the paradigmatic forms of private international law and has achieved a degree of legitimacy that is virtually unparalleled in the international realm. However, significant questions have recently begun to arise about the device’s public international attributes, stemming largely from a circuit split regarding the nature of the New York Convention, the leading treaty in the field, and Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, which helps give effect to the Convention in the United States.
Efforts have been made to place the debate about the New York Convention within the context of post-Medellin jurisprudence concerning self-executing treaties. However, that framework does not adequately address the difficult constitutional question as to what course should be adopted when a particular issue is governed by both a treaty and a statute that is meant to incorporate that treaty into domestic law.
This Article addresses that question by considering the role of and relationship between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act, and by providing a robust analysis of the constitutional, statutory and public international issues that arise in cases involving international treaties and incorporative statues. Although the discussion is rooted in the context of international commercial arbitration, the Article provides important theoretical and practical insights that are equally applicable in other types of public international law.
Keywords: constitutional law, public international law, private international law, international commercial arbitration, treaty interpretation, Federal Arbitration Act, FAA, New York Convention, arbitration
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Strong, S.I., Beyond the Self-Execution Analysis: Rationalizing Constitutional, Treaty and Statutory Interpretation in International Commercial Arbitration (February 28, 2013). 53 Virginia Journal of International Law, Forthcoming; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-05. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2226649