Judicial Oversight Over the Sale in Execution of Mortgaged Property: Gundwana v. Steko Development 2011 3 SA 608 (CC); Nedbank Ltd v. Fraser and Four Other Cases 2011 4 SA 363 (GSJ)

Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, Vol. 75, pp. 322-329, 2012

8 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2013

See all articles by AJ van der Walt

AJ van der Walt

Stellenbosch University - Law

Reghard Brits

Stellenbosch University

Date Written: May 2, 2012

Abstract

Section 26(3) of the South African Constitution requires judicial oversight and the taking into consideration of all relevant circumstances during any proceeding that might lead to the eviction of a person from her home. The purpose of judicial oversight is to ensure that homes are not sold in execution under circumstances where it would unjustifiably limit the homeowner’s “right to have access to adequate housing” (S 26(1)).

Keywords: judicial oversight, sale in execution, immovable property

Suggested Citation

van der Walt, AJ and Brits, Reghard, Judicial Oversight Over the Sale in Execution of Mortgaged Property: Gundwana v. Steko Development 2011 3 SA 608 (CC); Nedbank Ltd v. Fraser and Four Other Cases 2011 4 SA 363 (GSJ) (May 2, 2012). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, Vol. 75, pp. 322-329, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2227311

AJ Van der Walt (Contact Author)

Stellenbosch University - Law ( email )

South Africa

Reghard Brits

Stellenbosch University ( email )

South Africa

HOME PAGE: http://www.sun.ac.za

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
260
Abstract Views
894
Rank
256,177
PlumX Metrics