64 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2013
Date Written: March 2013
We study the incentives to merge in a Bertrand competition model where firms sell differentiated products and consumers search sequentially for satisfactory deals. In the pre-merger symmetric equilibrium, consumers visit firmsrandomly. However, after a merger, because insiders raise their prices more than the outsiders, consumers start searching for good deals at the non-merging stores, and only when they do not find a satisfactory product there they visit the merging firms. As search costs go up, consumer traffic from the non-merging firms to the merged ones decreases and eventually mergers become unprofitable. This new merger paradox can be overcome if the merged entity chooses to stock each of its stores with all the products of the constituent firms, which generates sizable search economies. We show that such demand-side economies can confer the merging firms a prominent position in the marketplace, in which case their price may even be lower than the price of the non-merging firms. In that situation, consumers start searching for a satisfactory good at the merged entity and the firms outside the merger lose out. When search economies are sufficiently large, a merger is beneficial for consumers too, and overall welfare increases.
Keywords: consumer search, demand-side economies, economies of search, insiders, long-run, mergers, orders of search, outsiders, prominence, sequential search, short-run
JEL Classification: D40, D83, L13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Moraga-González, José L. and Petrikaite, Vaiva, Search Costs, Demand-Side Economies and the Incentives to Merge Under Bertrand Competition (March 2013). CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP9374. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2228553
This is a CEPR Discussion Paper. CEPR charges a fee of $5.00 for this paper.Login using your CEPR Personal Profile
File name: DP9374.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.