Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Forthcoming
48 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2013 Last revised: 16 Mar 2015
Date Written: November 4, 2013
We argue that Machlup's (1955) interpretation of Mises’s epistemology is at least, if not more, plausible than Rothbard's (1957). The implications of Machlup’s interpretation of Mises and Austrian epistemology affect Austrians, non-Austrians and how they relate to each other. Machlup’s interpretation shows that Austrian’s epistemology is well grounded and that most criticisms of Austrian economics based on their aprioristic characteristic are misplaced. Furthermore, Machlup’s interpretation provides a potential road to re-built the academic interaction between Austrians and non-Austrians that was characteristic of the early twentieth century.
Keywords: Austrian economics, non-Austrian economics, Mises, Machlup, Rothbard, a priori, apriorism, Lakatos, Kuhn
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Zanotti, Gabriel J. and Cachanosky, Nicolas, The Epistemological Implications of Machlup's Interpretation of Mises's Epistemology (November 4, 2013). Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2229570 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2229570
By Andrew Young