Disappearing Subsidiaries: The Cases of Google and Oracle

37 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2013

Date Written: March 6, 2013


From 2009 to 2010, 98 percent of Google’s and 99 percent of Oracle’s subsidiaries disappeared from the Exhibit 21s filed with their SEC Form 10Ks. However, a March 2012 search of available public company registries revealed that at least 65 percent of the missing subsidiaries remained active as of the companies’ 2010 filing dates. The decisions of Google and Oracle to disclose fewer subsidiaries stands in contrast to the literature documenting that firms providing more information enjoy lower costs of debt and equity capital. We employ legitimacy theory, institutional theory, agency theory, and political cost theory to explain the Google and Oracle decisions. Ultimately, however, we develop a new insight, that tax avoidance represents an additional source of capital beyond debt and equity, and this capital source exists in a unique setting that encourages less disclosure of certain types of information.

Keywords: Tax Avoidance, Tax Haven, Exhibit 21, Subsidiary

JEL Classification: G32, H21, H25, H73, K34, L86

Suggested Citation

Gramlich, Jeffrey and Whiteaker-Poe, Janie, Disappearing Subsidiaries: The Cases of Google and Oracle (March 6, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2229576 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2229576

Jeffrey Gramlich (Contact Author)

Carson College of Business ( email )

Wilson Rd.
College of Business
Pullman, WA 99164
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://business.wsu.edu/research-faculty/institutes/hoops-institute/

Janie Whiteaker-Poe

Baylor University ( email )

Waco, TX 76798
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics