Footnotes (87)



Kidney Allocation and the Limits of the Age Discrimination Act

Benjamin Eidelson


March 6, 2013

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, No. 6, 2013

In September 2012, the government-chartered body responsible for allocating cadaveric organs in the United States proposed a plan to make better use of the scarce supply of kidneys through "longevity matching." Critics have charged the plan with age discrimination, since it will deliberately allocate high-quality kidneys to younger candidates at the expense of older candidates with equal or greater medical need. These allegations raise significant legal and moral questions, and the debate they have sparked offers a revealing vantage point on the ways discrimination is conceptualized within and outside the law.

This paper offers the first analysis of the legality of the proposal under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, which bars age discrimination in federally funded programs. It then argues that the statute fails to speak to the central moral concerns about the plan, which have less to do with instrumental irrationality or arbitrariness than with the potential for discriminatory rationing to denigrate the equal worth of older people.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: organ donation, age discrimination, ADA, OPTN, kidneys

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 7, 2013 ; Last revised: April 3, 2014

Suggested Citation

Eidelson, Benjamin, Kidney Allocation and the Limits of the Age Discrimination Act (March 6, 2013). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, No. 6, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2229583

Contact Information

Benjamin Eidelson (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 564
Downloads: 119
Download Rank: 187,122
Footnotes:  87