Reforming Medical Malpractice Liability Through Contract

22 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2013  

Michael F. Cannon

Cato Institute

Date Written: November 12, 2010

Abstract

This paper discusses the medical malpractice “crisis” and the potential of contract liability to reduce overall malpractice costs as well as improve the quality of and access to care. First, the paper describes the current medical malpractice liability “system” and some of the more common reforms offered. It then discusses the economic rationale of allowing patients and providers to agree in advance of treatment on how the patient will be compensated in the event of simple negligence on the part of providers, explaining how contract liability may offer improvements in the areas of costs, patient preferences, the pursuit of more efficient liability rules, and quality of care. The paper then critiques select objections to contract liability – those based on the superior bargaining power of providers, the lack of information available to patients, and possible reductions in quality – and forwards possible limitations on the right to contract that may allay such concerns.

Keywords: contractual liability, medical malpractice insurance, U.S. tort law, medical malpractice reform, American healthcare system, united states legal reform, professional liability, medical malpractice lawsuits

JEL Classification: K10, K13, Ill, I13

Suggested Citation

Cannon, Michael F., Reforming Medical Malpractice Liability Through Contract (November 12, 2010). Cato Institute Working Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2231658 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2231658

Michael F. Cannon (Contact Author)

Cato Institute ( email )

1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States
202-218-4632 (Phone)
202-842-3490 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.cato.org/people/cannon.html

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Rank
308,474
Abstract Views
298