Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) on ChiNext: Good Investment or Not?
45 Pages Posted: 14 Mar 2013
Date Written: February 14, 2013
Abstract
We study the IPO underpricing and long-run performance of ChiNext, a newly-established growth enterprise board in China. Using a sample of 281 ChiNext IPOs between October 2009 and December 2011, the initial average market adjusted abnormal return (MAAR) is 33.5% and the average 12-month buy-and-hold abnormal return (BHAR) is -45.7%. Although the average MAARs of ChiNext is significantly higher than that of Main Board IPOs, it is not significantly different from SME Board IPOs during the sample period. However, the ChiNext average BHARs is significantly lower than those on both the SME and Main Boards. Regression findings support the information asymmetry hypothesis and the behavioural theory on underpricing for ChiNext IPOs, and we find that underperformance of ChiNext IPOs is consistent with the significant decrease of their operating performance after listing.
Keywords: ChiNext, initial public offerings, underpricing, underperformance
JEL Classification: G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
By Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
By Ivo Welch and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos: Theory and Evidence
-
Common Stock Offerings Across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence
By Hyuk Choe, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert