Foreword: Accounting for Technological Change
Orin S. Kerr
The George Washington University Law School
March 16, 2013
36 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 403 (2013)
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-73
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2013-73
This short essay considers how the Fourth Amendment should apply to the search of a cellular phone seized incident to arrest. It argues that the storage capacity and type of evidence stored on a cell phone justifies a departure from existing Fourth Amendment doctrine. Under United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973), the Fourth Amendment always permits a "full" search of a person and property on his person at the time of arrest. This essay argues that the Supreme Court should reject that standard for searches of digital storage devices. Instead, Court should adopt the standard that the Court adopted in Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), for searching an automobile incident to arrest.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7
Keywords: Fourth Amendment, cell phones, search incident to arrest
Date posted: March 17, 2013 ; Last revised: July 13, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds