The Relative Asset Pricing Model: Incorporating Liabilities and Delegation to Chief Investment Officers — Version 0.1

16 Pages Posted: 8 May 2013

See all articles by Arun Muralidhar

Arun Muralidhar

AlphaEngine Global Investment Solutions

Sung Hwan Shin

Korea Fixed Income Research Institute

Date Written: March 1, 2013

Abstract

This paper makes a simple but bold argument that because mean-variance optimization (MVO) and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) were derived from a theoretical construct rather than reality, they represent a specialized case of a more general theory. We suggest a theory based on the liability to be serviced by an investment portfolio that is managed by a delegated decision maker. From this perspective, all decisions are relative; hence we present a relative asset pricing model (RAPM) as the true starting point for asset pricing theory. RAPM accommodates the fact that real investors are concerned about the relative return of their portfolios (relative mean) and the relative risk of their portfolios (composed of two independent variables — relative variance and correlation). Moreover, investors are concerned about their agents’ skill to generate alpha. Turning off these features gives us CAPM; hence our claim that CAPM is a stylized model of a more general theory. Because current theory was derived from the assumptions that investors are concerned about their absolute wealth and that they know the return distribution, which is characterized by mean and variance, it misses an important part of real-life decision making. When investors are concerned about the relative return of their portfolios and do not know the return distribution that is generated by their agents, correlation matters in addition to mean and variance. Therefore investment decision making will occur in three-dimensional space rather than the mean-variance two-dimensional plane. A decision maker forced to choose only two of three or more independent variables would get a limited result. This is exactly what happens with investment theory. This paper provides the foundation for adding a correlation dimension. We hope that other talented academics will help develop RAPM, which will provide better recommendations for asset pricing, asset allocation, rebalancing, risk-adjusted performance calculations, and manager compensation.

Keywords: relative asset pricing model, asset pricing theory

JEL Classification: G00, G10, G11

Suggested Citation

Muralidhar, Arun and Shin, Sung Hwan, The Relative Asset Pricing Model: Incorporating Liabilities and Delegation to Chief Investment Officers — Version 0.1 (March 1, 2013). Journal of Investment Consulting, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 17-31, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2235279

Arun Muralidhar (Contact Author)

AlphaEngine Global Investment Solutions ( email )

Princeton, NJ
United States

Sung Hwan Shin

Korea Fixed Income Research Institute ( email )

Seoul
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
12
Abstract Views
546
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information