Cultural Dimensions of Group Litigation: The Belgian Case

48 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2013 Last revised: 4 Sep 2013

See all articles by Stefaan Voet

Stefaan Voet

KU Leuven - Institute for Civil Procedure

Date Written: September 2013

Abstract

People assume that only the U.S. has class actions, and that assumption is increasingly wrong. The existence of mass harms with large numbers of claimants has created challenges for access to justice, judicial efficiency, and the enforcement of legal norms that make traditional individual litigation unworkable. Therefore, many European countries are struggling to craft procedural mechanisms to allow the resolution of group claims in a way that incorporates the helpful parts of U.S. class actions while avoiding its inefficiencies and potential abuses.

This Article will discuss the current debate in Belgium. It begins, in part I, by putting that debate in the European context and by describing the current Belgian dilemma. Part II sets out three proposals for a Belgian class action device, highlighting their common elements, as well as their difficulties. Part III analyzes those proposals in light of class action theory (class action goals, standing, funding and financing, remedies, and the role of the courts), arguing that none of the proposals have been sufficiently thought out and that each needs amendment or elaboration. Finally, part IV concludes by putting the civil class action in the larger context of processes for dealing with group harms and argues that a holistic approach is needed.

Keywords: group litigation, complex litigation, class actions, Belgium

Suggested Citation

Voet, Stefaan, Cultural Dimensions of Group Litigation: The Belgian Case (September 2013). 41 GA. J. INT’L & COMP. L. 433, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2235645

Stefaan Voet (Contact Author)

KU Leuven - Institute for Civil Procedure ( email )

Tiensestraat 41
Leuven, B-3000
Belgium

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
110
Abstract Views
571
rank
287,555
PlumX Metrics