Evidence and Provisional Measures in Complex Litigation and Class Actions: Belgium

15 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2013

See all articles by Stefaan Voet

Stefaan Voet

KU Leuven - Institute for Civil Procedure

Date Written: March 19, 2013

Abstract

This national (Belgian) report was written for a panel on ‘Evidence and Provisional Measures in Complex Litigation and Class Actions’ for the 2012 Buenos Aires Conference organized by the International Association of Procedural Law and the Ibero-American Institute of Procedural Law.

After a general – de lege lata and de lege ferenda – description of the current Belgian procedures for handling a series or group of related claims (chapter A), the report pays attention to the motion to certify or authorize a collective action (chapter B). Particular attention is paid to the standard or burden of proof that a plaintiff must meet and the evidentiary burden inquiry by the court. In this context a detailed overview is given of the five (Belgian) means of proof in civil law and the techniques of evidence the Belgian Judicial Code contains. Finally, the report describes the standard or burden of proof after certification or authorization of any collective action (chapter C), the standard of proof of fairness of any collective settlement (chapter D), and the provisional measures relevant to collective actions (chapter E).

Keywords: evidence, provisional measures, complex litigation, class actions, Belgium

Suggested Citation

Voet, Stefaan, Evidence and Provisional Measures in Complex Litigation and Class Actions: Belgium (March 19, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2235653 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2235653

Stefaan Voet (Contact Author)

KU Leuven - Institute for Civil Procedure ( email )

Tiensestraat 41
Leuven, B-3000
Belgium

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
387
rank
430,043
PlumX Metrics