Risk and Execution: The Local Impact of Capital Cases on Mississippi Counties

39 Pages Posted: 21 Mar 2013 Last revised: 2 Apr 2019

See all articles by Valena Elizabeth Beety

Valena Elizabeth Beety

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Date Written: March 20, 2013

Abstract

Mississippi codified the death penalty because people thought a death sentence was a fair punishment for the most heinous of crimes. And, as predicted by behavioral economics, people were willing to sacrifice their own material well-being — in other words, willing to pay — to punish wrongdoers.

But the death penalty is not fair. Regardless of whether the death penalty is a just punishment, the financial toll that this policy places on citizens and counties is unfair. Because citizens have continually paid the costs of punishment, the costs have slowly disappeared from sight and knowledge in correlation to their growth. As the cost of a death penalty trial rises through subsequent appeals, counties must levy additional taxes to pay trial expenses, instead of using these taxes to pay for paving roads or repairing bridges. Few officials discuss the financial burden and consequences of the death penalty. This Article seeks to remedy that silence.

Keywords: death penalty, Mississippi, criminal justice, capital cases

Suggested Citation

Beety, Valena Elizabeth, Risk and Execution: The Local Impact of Capital Cases on Mississippi Counties (March 20, 2013). 82 Miss. L.J. 1337 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2236256

Valena Elizabeth Beety (Contact Author)

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
62
Abstract Views
559
rank
378,302
PlumX Metrics