Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2237538
 


 



Who's at the Helm? The Federal Circuit's Rule of Deference and the Systemic Absence of Controlling Precedent in Matters of Patent Litigation Procedure


Peter J. Karol


New England Law | Boston

January 1, 2009

American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, Vol. 37, 2009
New England Law | Boston Research Paper

Abstract:     
This article considers the Federal Circuit’s rule of deference to the law of the regional circuits in matters of procedure as that rule approaches its twenty-fifth anniversary. Using the recent Bell Atlantic v. Twombly pleading case as an illustration, the article observes that the structure of the current appellate review scheme creates a systemic absence of controlling precedent relating to patent litigation procedure. Moreover, the arguments usually advanced for the rule’s existence, including efficiency gains and legislative history, are doubtful. As prior scholarship has shown, the rule is not a natural byproduct of the appellate structure created by Congress when it passed the Federal Circuit’s founding legislation, but rather a notable exception to the principal of competence underlying the federal appellate system. When properly situated as an exception to the norm, the burdens created by the rule ultimately outweigh the benefits. The rule of deference should thus never have been adopted, and should be overturned.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: rule of deference, patent litigation, Federal Circuit


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Karol, Peter J., Who's at the Helm? The Federal Circuit's Rule of Deference and the Systemic Absence of Controlling Precedent in Matters of Patent Litigation Procedure (January 1, 2009). American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, Vol. 37, 2009; New England Law | Boston Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2237538

Contact Information

Peter J. Karol (Contact Author)
New England Law | Boston ( email )
154 Stuart St.
Boston, MA 02116
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 204
Downloads: 6