Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society?

The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 210-233

25 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2013 Last revised: 24 Jun 2013

See all articles by Bent Flyvbjerg

Bent Flyvbjerg

University of Oxford - Said Business School; IT University of Copenhagen

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 1, 1998


Taken together, the works of Jürgen Habermas and Michel Foucault highlight an essential tension in modernity. This is the tension between the normative and the real, between what should be done and what is actually done. Understanding this tension is crucial to understanding modern democracy, what it is and what it could be. It has been argued that an effective way of making democracy stronger is to strengthen civil society. This article contains a comparative analysis of the central ideas of Habermas and Foucault as they pertain to the question of democracy and civil society. More specifically, the discourse ethics of Habermas is contrasted with the power analytics and ethics of Foucault evaluating their usefulness for those interested in understanding, and bringing about, democratic social change.

La versión española de este artículo se puede encontrar en: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2278394

Suggested Citation

Flyvbjerg, Bent, Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for Civil Society? (June 1, 1998). The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 210-233, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2237923 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237923

Bent Flyvbjerg (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Said Business School ( email )

Park End Street
Oxford, OX1 1HP
Great Britain

IT University of Copenhagen ( email )


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics