Footnotes (109)



Race and the Disappointing Right to Counsel

Gabriel "Jack" Chin

University of California, Davis - School of Law

April 2013

122 Yale Law Journal, 2013, Forthcoming
UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 334

Critics of the criminal justice system observe that the promise of Gideon v. Wainwright has been unfulfilled. They decry both the inadequate quality of representation available to indigent defendants, and the racially disproportionate outcome of the process. Some hope that better representation can help remedy the gross overrepresentation of minorities in the criminal justice system. This essay is doubtful that better lawyers will significantly address that problem.

When the Supreme Court decided Gideon, it had two main purposes. First, it intended to protect the innocent from conviction. This goal, while imperfectly achieved at best, was explicit. Since Gideon, the Court has continued to recognize the importance of claims of innocence at trial, with important, pro-defense decisions in the areas of confrontation, jury fact-finding, the right to present a defense and in other areas.

The Court's second goal was to protect African Americans subject to the Jim Crow system of criminal justice. But, as it had in Powell v. Alabama, the Court pursued this end covertly and indirectly; the Court attempted to deal with racial discrimination without explicitly addressing it. This timidity was portentous. Gideon did not mark the beginning of a judicial project to eliminate race from the criminal justice system root and branch; three years after Gideon, the Court allowed prosecutors to exercise peremptory challenges of jurors based on race. Since Gideon, the Court has made it practically impossible to invoke racial bias as a defense; so long as those charged are in fact guilty, discrimination in legislative criminalization, in enforcement and in sentencing practices are essentially unchallengeable.

Since Gideon, racial disproportionality in the prison population has increased. Not only might Gideon not have solved the problem, it may have exacerbated it. To the extent that Gideon improved the quality of counsel available to the poor, defense lawyers may be able to obtain favorable exercises of discretion in investigation, prosecution and sentencing for indigent white defendants that they cannot for clients of color. For these reasons, racial disparity likely cannot be remedied indirectly, with more or better lawyers. Instead, the remedy lies in directly prohibiting discrimination, and having fewer crimes on the books, fewer arrests, and fewer prosecutions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Gideon v. Wainwright. sixth amendment, counsel, assistance of counsel, indigent defense

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2013 ; Last revised: April 27, 2013

Suggested Citation

Chin, Gabriel "Jack", Race and the Disappointing Right to Counsel (April 2013). 122 Yale Law Journal, 2013, Forthcoming; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 334. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2238021

Contact Information

Gabriel Jackson Chin (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
400 Mrak Hall Dr.
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
520-401-6586 (Phone)
530-754-5311 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 975
Downloads: 127
Download Rank: 177,726
Footnotes:  109