The Meaning of Science in the Copyright Clause

Ned Snow

University of South Carolina

March 16, 2013

Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 2, 2013

The Constitution premises Congress’s copyright power on promoting “the Progress of Science.” The word Science therefore seems to define the scope of copyrightable subject matter. Modern courts and commentators have subscribed to an originalist view of Science, teaching that Science meant general knowledge at the time of the Framing. Under this interpretation, all subject matter may be copyrighted because expression about any subject increases society’s store of general knowledge. Science, however, did not originally mean general knowledge. In this Article, I examine evidence surrounding the Copyright Clause and conclude that at the Framing of the Constitution, Science meant a system of knowledge that comprises distinct branches of study. This historically accurate meaning casts doubt on whether a distinct group of expression may be copyrighted — namely, expression that the First Amendment does not protect. I argue that the original meaning of Science cannot support a constitutional copyright of unprotected speech.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: copyright, constitution, science, intellectual property clause, copyright clause, progress clause

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 24, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Snow, Ned, The Meaning of Science in the Copyright Clause (March 16, 2013). Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 2, 2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2238191

Contact Information

Ned Snow (Contact Author)
University of South Carolina ( email )
701 Main Street
Columbia, SC 29208
United States
(803) 777-8064 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.sc.edu/faculty/snow/
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 783
Downloads: 96
Download Rank: 217,708
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper