75 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2013 Last revised: 4 Sep 2015
Date Written: March 18, 2013
The Supreme Court utilizes the suspect class doctrine in order to balance institutional concerns with the protection of important constitutional rights. The Court, however, inconsistently applies this doctrine, and it has not precisely defined its contours. The political powerlessness factor is especially undertheorized and contradictory. Nevertheless, this factor has become salient in recent equal protection cases brought by gays and lesbians. Indeed, the Court is currently reviewing a court of appeals case that applies this doctrine and finds that gays and lesbians constitute a quasi-suspect class. Recent scholarship and case law have addressed the inefficiencies of suspect class doctrine. This Article discusses the inadequacies of the suspect class doctrine and the emerging scholarship and case law that respond to it. This Article offers two alternatives approaches that could inform a new theory of equal protection.
Keywords: LGBT, equal protection, Fourteenth Amendment, political powerlessness, Suspect Class Doctrine, Windsor v US, Perry v Brown, Hollingsworth v Perry, intermediate scrutiny, same-sex marriage, Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, political scientists, Carolene Products, heightened scrutiny
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hutchinson, Darren Lenard, 'Not Without Political Power': Gays and Lesbians, Equal Protection, and the Suspect Class Doctrine (March 18, 2013). Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65; University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 15-3. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2238733 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238733