Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society's Practice Groups, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 34-35, February 2013
3 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2013
Date Written: March 25, 2013
This symposium contribution very succinctly summarizes the principal arguments for concluding that the Constitution does not require governments to recognize same-sex marriages.
Keywords: Baker, civil union, DOMA, defense, definition, equality, Evans, Glucksberg, Hollingsworth v. Perry, homosexuals, invalidate, Lawrence, legislative decisions, Loving, man, one, physician-assisted suicide, precedent, rights, Romer, Supreme Court, Texas, traditional purpose, Virginia, Washington, woman
JEL Classification: J12, J18
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lund, Nelson, Same-Sex Marriage in the Courts of Law and Reason (March 25, 2013). Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society's Practice Groups, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 34-35, February 2013; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-23. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2239254