Restraining Overconfident CEOs through Improved Governance: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Review of Financial Studies, 2015, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2812-2858
UNSW Australian School of Business Research Paper No. 2013 BFIN 05
Stevens Institute of Technology School of Business Research Paper
65 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2013 Last revised: 18 Jan 2018
Date Written: 2015
Abstract
The literature posits that some CEO overconfidence benefits shareholders, though high levels may not. We argue adequate controls and independent viewpoints provided by an independent board mitigates the costs of CEO overconfidence. We use the concurrent passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and changes to the NYSE/NASDAQ listing rules (collectively, SOX) as natural experiments to examine whether board independence improves decision-making by overconfident-CEOs. The results are strongly supportive: Post-SOX, overconfident CEOs reduce investment and risk exposure, increase dividends, improve post-acquisition performance, and have better operating performance and market value. Importantly, these changes are absent for overconfident-CEO firms that were compliant prior to passage.
Keywords: Over-Confidence, Over-Investment, Risk-Taking, Quality of Investment, SOX, Firm Performance
JEL Classification: G23, G32, G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Who Makes Acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the Market's Reaction
-
On the Evolution of Overconfidence and Entrepreneurs
By Antonio E. Bernardo and Ivo Welch
-
Market Timing and Managerial Portfolio Decisions
By Dirk Jenter
-
Behavioral Corporate Finance: A Survey
By Malcolm P. Baker, Richard S. Ruback, ...
-
Behavioral Corporate Finance: A Survey
By Malcolm P. Baker, Richard S. Ruback, ...
-
Behavioral Corporate Finance: A Survey
By Malcolm P. Baker, Richard S. Ruback, ...