A Primer on the Government of Alberta's Budget

16 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2013

See all articles by Ronald D. Kneebone

Ronald D. Kneebone

University of Calgary - The School of Public Policy; University of Calgary - Department of Economics

Date Written: January 21, 2013

Abstract

Provincial budgets may normally make for dry reading, but in Alberta’s case, there is plenty of suspense lurking inside the pages — and that’s not necessarily a good thing. Your average family may know certain things about balancing a budget: keeping spending roughly in line with income; not relying on volatile, unpredictable income streams to cover expenses; and not leaving the kids with an inheritance of significant debt. But look at how Alberta has been managing its budget in the last decade, and it is obvious that the provincial government is breaking a lot of the financial management rules that most Albertans are disciplined enough to live by at home.

A clear way to get a sense of how the Alberta government has managed its finances is by analyzing how much provincial program spending relies on depleting provincial savings, either in the form of savings funds or non-renewable resource deposits, such as oil and gas. By 2011, Alberta’s “Budget Gap” had grown to almost the same level it was in 1993, when the province was forced to adopt wrenching budget cuts in order to close what had become a yawning gap between revenue and costs amounting to $4,000 in spending for every man, woman and child in the province. This paper suggests there are three key questions that should be posed to our government and to any political party seeking to represent our interests as our government: 1. How tolerant are they of annual deficits? Do they advocate a strategy of relatively lower levels of government spending and/or higher tax rates, so as to avoid deficits no matter the state of the economy? Or will they tolerate deficits during economic slowdowns to enable higher levels of spending and/or lower tax rates? 2. To what extent are they willing to trust the payment of health-care costs and the costs of education and social assistance to oil and gas royalties as opposed to taxation? 3. How, exactly, does one define investments in social infrastructure; investments that can be funded by borrowing or by spending non-renewable resource royalties? What limits should be put on borrowing to fund such expenditures?

Keywords: fiscal, policy, planning, budget, tax, spending, revenue, cost, energy, wealth, resource, finance

JEL Classification: H2, H30, H41, H71, H72, H70, Q32

Suggested Citation

Kneebone, Ron, A Primer on the Government of Alberta's Budget (January 21, 2013). SPP Research Paper No. 6-2, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2240403

Ron Kneebone (Contact Author)

University of Calgary - The School of Public Policy

Calgary, Alberta
Canada

University of Calgary - Department of Economics ( email )

2500 University Drive, NW
Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4
Canada

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
349
PlumX Metrics