60 Pages Posted: 29 Mar 2013 Last revised: 26 Mar 2014
Date Written: December 5, 2013
This Article offers a broad theory of what distinguishes investment funds from ordinary companies, with ramifications for how these funds are understood and regulated. The central claim is that investment funds (i.e., mutual funds, hedge funds, private equity funds and their cousins) are distinguished not by the assets they hold, but by their unique organizational structures. These structures separate investment assets and management assets into different entities with different owners. The investments belong to “funds,” while the management assets belong to “management companies.” This structure benefits investors in the funds in a rather paradoxical way: it limits their rights to control their managers and share in their managers’ profits and liabilities. Fund investors accept these limits because certain features common to most investment funds make them efficient. Those features include powerful investor exit rights and economies of scope and scale that encourage managers to operate multiple funds at the same time. These features diminish the importance of control and increase the importance of asset partitioning. This way of understanding investment funds sheds light on a number of key areas of contracting and regulation and refutes the claims of skeptics who say that fund investors would be better off if they employed their managers directly.
Keywords: Mutual fund, private equity fund, hedge fund, investment fund, securities, organization, asset partitioning, exit rights, investment company
JEL Classification: G23, G24, K00, K22, L22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Morley, John, The Separation of Funds and Managers: A Theory of Investment Fund Structure and Regulation (December 5, 2013). 123 Yale Law Journal 1228 (2014); Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2013-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2240468 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2240468