Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl: Two and a Half Ways to Destroy Indian Law

8 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 2013 Last revised: 28 May 2013

See all articles by Marcia Anne Zug

Marcia Anne Zug

University of South Carolina School of Law

Date Written: March 28, 2013


On April 16th, the US Supreme court will hear arguments in the case Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl. This case involves an Indian child whose attempted adoption by a non-Indian couple in South Carolina violated the provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Because of this violation, the family court ordered her return to her biological father. The case has received extensive media attention and has resulted in the vilification of ICWA. Nevertheless, the Court’s decision to hear the case was surprising. The issues in the case are straightforward and the lower courts’ decisions were clearly correct. Consequently, the Supreme Court’s interest likely indicates that this case will be used to address broader issues than those delineated in the questions presented. This essay explores the legal issues raised by the Baby Girl case and examine the ways in which the Court is likely to use this decision to redefine current understanding of ICWA and maybe all of Indian law.

Keywords: ICWA, best interest, children's rights, paretnal rights, termination, Indians

Suggested Citation

Yablon-Zug, Marcia Anne, Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl: Two and a Half Ways to Destroy Indian Law (March 28, 2013). Michigan Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN:

Marcia Anne Yablon-Zug (Contact Author)

University of South Carolina School of Law ( email )

1525 Senate Street
Columbia, SC 29208
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics