Pricing Parisian Options: The Extended Binomial Tree vs. Monte-Carlo Simulation

16 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2013

See all articles by Tao L. Wu

Tao L. Wu

Illinois Institute of Technology

Date Written: March 30, 2013

Abstract

I extend the Cox, Ross, Rubinstein binomial model to price Parisian options and compare it with Monte-Carlo simulation. The CRR tree is extended to solve the path-dependence of Parisian options by keeping track of a vector of prices that the Parisian option may take at each tree node under different scenarios. The extended model can be applied to price a class of path-dependent options with minimal modifications. I also incorporate the method for choosing the number of time-steps that will yield more precise price estimates. The results are then compared to those given by closed-form formulas in the limiting cases by setting time-below the barrier (in a knock-out option) to be zero or longer than the option maturity. The extended binomial model requires less computing time to produce accurate results when compared with the Monte-Carlo approach. Moreover, with a small modification, the extended binomial model can price American style Parisian options. On the other hand, Monte-Carlo simulation is superior to account for discrete price monitoring and to provide likely error in the pricing estimates.

Keywords: Option pricing, Binomial Models, Parisian option

JEL Classification: G12

Suggested Citation

Wu, Tao L., Pricing Parisian Options: The Extended Binomial Tree vs. Monte-Carlo Simulation (March 30, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2242300 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2242300

Tao L. Wu (Contact Author)

Illinois Institute of Technology ( email )

Stuart Graduate School of Business
565 W. Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
216
Abstract Views
988
rank
141,252
PlumX Metrics