Congress and the Political Expansion of the United States District Courts
34 Pages Posted: 30 Apr 2000
There are 2 versions of this paper
Congress and the Political Expansion of the United States District Courts
Date Written: Undated
Abstract
Expanding the number of U.S. district judgeships is often justified as a response to expanding caseloads. Increasing judgeships during unified government, however, allows Congress and the President to engage in political (patronage and ideological) control of the federal district courts. This paper examines empirically the relative importance of caseload pressure and political motives for Congress to expand the number of federal district judgeships. We demonstrate that politics dominates the timing of judgeship expansion in the U.S. District Courts. We also show that both politics and caseload affect the actual size of those timed expansions. In particular, we find that before 1970, Congress seemed to have strong political motivations for the size of an expansion. After 1970, Congress became much more attentive to caseload considerations.
JEL Classification: K0, K4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Case for Managed Judges: Learning from Japan after the Political Upheaval of 1993
-
The Industrial Organization of the Japanese Bar: Levels and Determinants of Attorney Incomes
By Minoru Nakazato, J. Mark Ramseyer, ...
-
By Vicki Schultz and Stephen Petterson
-
Strategic Judicial Decision Making
By Pablo T. Spiller and Rafael Gely
-
The Supreme Court and the Dig: An Empirical and Institutional Analysis
By Michael Solimine and Rafael Gely
-
The Japanese Judiciary: Maintaining Integrity, Autonomy and the Public Trust
-
By Tonja Jacobi
-
Medical Error as Reportable Event, as Tort, as Crime: A Transpacific Comparison
By Robert B Leflar and Futoshi Iwata
-
The Anatomy of a Conservative Court: Judicial Review in Japan
By David S. Law