Palestine and the Conceptual Problem of Implicit Statehood

12 Chinese Journal of International Law (2013) 19-41

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 47/2013

17 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2013 Last revised: 28 May 2013

See all articles by Jure Vidmar

Jure Vidmar

Maastricht University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 2013

Abstract

The General Assembly has accorded to Palestine the status of a non-member observer state in the UN. Some commentators have taken the position that Palestine's legal status as a state has thus been confirmed. This article draws on historical examples to demonstrate that the status of non-member state is not necessarily granted only to states. The recent vote in the General Assembly, therefore, neither confirmed nor altered the legal status of Palestine. But irrespective of this vote, Palestine nevertheless has a previously-acquired international capacity to act like a state and can, inter alia, become a party to the ICC Statute and bring a case to the ICJ. Such a capacity could be seen as an implicit confirmation of statehood. This article, however, demonstrates that state creation cannot be an implicit side-effect of international treaties or voting procedures in international organizations. Not even (full) membership of the UN is an exception.

Keywords: Palestine, General Assembly, non-member observer state, implicit statehood

Suggested Citation

Vidmar, Jure, Palestine and the Conceptual Problem of Implicit Statehood (April 2013). 12 Chinese Journal of International Law (2013) 19-41; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 47/2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2243371

Jure Vidmar (Contact Author)

Maastricht University - Faculty of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200
Netherlands

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
637
Abstract Views
2,306
rank
40,909
PlumX Metrics