Mitigating Climate Change: Decomposing the Relative Roles of Energy Conservation, Technological Change, and Structural Shift

22 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2013

See all articles by Gouri Shankar Mishra

Gouri Shankar Mishra

University of California, Davis - Institute of Transportation Studies

Mohammadsaleh Zakerinia

University of California, Davis

Sonia Yeh

University of California, Davis - Institute of Transportation Studies

Jacob Teter

University of California, Davis

Geoffrey Morrison

University of California, Davis

Date Written: March 2, 2013

Abstract

We decompose the impacts of five drivers of energy use and CO2 emissions in achieving climate change goals over 2005-2100 for various climate policy scenarios. This study contributes to the decomposition literature in three ways. First, it disaggregates drivers of energy demand into technological progress and demand for energy services allowing us to estimate their contributions independently – an improvement over other economy-wide decomposition studies. Secondly, this approach reduces the ambiguity present in many previous measures of structural change. We delineate structural shifts into two separate measures: changes in fuel mix within a given resource or service; and changes in mix among distinct energy resources or end-use services. Finally, this study applies decomposition methods to energy and emissions trajectories from two mutually informing perspectives: (i) primary energy resources – crude oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, and renewables; and (ii) end-uses of energy services – residential and commercial buildings, industry, and transportation.

Our results show that technological improvements and energy conservation are important in meeting short term and moderate climate goals; and that nuclear and renewable energy and CCS technology are crucial in meeting more stringent goals. We examine the relative roles of the drivers in reducing CO2 emissions separately for developed and developing regions. Although the majority of energy and emissions growth – and by extension the greatest opportunities for mitigation – will occur in developing countries, the decomposition shows that the relative roles of the five drivers are broadly consistent between these two regions.

While similar decompositions have been conducted on historical data, very few have decomposed future scenarios from an integrated assessment model, and at this level of detail.

Keywords: decomposition analysis, integrated assessment model, Logarithmic Mean Weight Divisia Method (LDM), energy efficiency, energy services, Greenhouse gas emissions, transportation, carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), primary energy, useful energy, energy services

JEL Classification: Q2, Q3, Q4, N7

Suggested Citation

Mishra, Gouri Shankar and Zakerinia, Mohammadsaleh and Yeh, Sonia and Teter, Jacob and Morrison, Geoffrey, Mitigating Climate Change: Decomposing the Relative Roles of Energy Conservation, Technological Change, and Structural Shift (March 2, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2243942 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2243942

Gouri Shankar Mishra (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - Institute of Transportation Studies

One Shields Ave
Davis, CA 95616
United States

Mohammadsaleh Zakerinia

University of California, Davis ( email )

Apt 153

Sonia Yeh

University of California, Davis - Institute of Transportation Studies ( email )

One Shields Avenue
Apt 153
Davis, CA 95616
United States

HOME PAGE: http://steps.ucdavis.edu/People/slyeh

Jacob Teter

University of California, Davis

Apt 153

Geoffrey Morrison

University of California, Davis ( email )

Apt 153

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Abstract Views
803
rank
453,562
PlumX Metrics