What Exactly are Exactions?

Jessica Owley

University at Buffalo Law School

June 26, 2013

New York Environmental Lawyer (Spring 2013)
SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-003

This brief piece for the publication of the Environmental Law Section of the New York Bar Association discusses the potential implications of Koontz v. St. John's River Water Management District (pending before the U.S. Supreme Court) and its implications for New York law. While all exactions must undergo a Nollan/Dolan level of scrutiny, New York courts have limited the reach of this analysis by narrowly defining what constitutes an exaction. In Smith v. Town of Mendon, the New York Court of Appeals defined exactions strangely. First, it held that conservation restrictions did not qualify as exactions unless they required public access. Second, bound by precedent, the court recognized that in lieu fees are exactions requiring Nollan/Dolan analysis. These holdings seem out of step with Supreme Court jurisprudence and likely to require revisitation after the Court issues its opinion in Koontz. At oral argument, the justices appeared to interpret exactions much more broadly than the New York courts.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 5

Keywords: Koontz, Exactions, Nollan, Dolan, Takings, Town of Mendon

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 29, 2013 ; Last revised: November 7, 2013

Suggested Citation

Owley, Jessica, What Exactly are Exactions? (June 26, 2013). New York Environmental Lawyer (Spring 2013); SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2245709

Contact Information

Jessica Owley (Contact Author)
University at Buffalo Law School ( email )
School of Law
528 O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-1100
United States
716-645-8182 (Phone)
716-645-2064 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 499
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 250,090