Comparative Analysis of Value at Risk (VAR) Methods for Portfolio with Non-Linear Return

Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, Vol. 2, Issue 10, October 2012

14 Pages Posted: 7 Apr 2013

See all articles by Manohar Lal

Manohar Lal

Fiji National University (FNU)

Date Written: Oct 10, 2012

Abstract

In this study various value at risk methods such as Historical Simulation, Variance-Covariance Approach and Monte Carlo Simulation are calculated, compared and tested for accuracy. Backtesting for the VaR methods is applied to check the accuracy of the VaR methods. The portfolio includes equally weighted three banking stock and one at-the-money (ATM) call option for one of the banking stock in the portfolio. The log return for the portfolio and individual investments are calculated. Different VaR calculation methods are used to calculate the downside risk of the portfolio and individual investments. VaR is calculated at 95% and 99% confidence level for the portfolio and individual securities. The value at risk for the portfolio at 95% confidence level from all the three methods are within the defined level of downside risk, while at 99% confidence level only Mote Carlo Simulation method provides good approximation of downside risk for a portfolio with options. Thus from this study it is inferred that for instrument or portfolio with non-linear return structure Monte Carlo simulation method provide good approximation of the downside risk.

Keywords: Value at Risk, VaR, Historical Simulation, Variance-Covariance method, Monte Carlo Simulation method, Backtesting

Suggested Citation

Lal, Manohar, Comparative Analysis of Value at Risk (VAR) Methods for Portfolio with Non-Linear Return (Oct 10, 2012). Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance, Vol. 2, Issue 10, October 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2245929

Manohar Lal (Contact Author)

Fiji National University (FNU) ( email )

P.O.Box 7222
Fiji

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
336
Abstract Views
1,283
Rank
174,353
PlumX Metrics