On the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion

36 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2013 Last revised: 5 Oct 2013

Andrew Tutt

Independent

Date Written: April 6, 2013

Abstract

This Note argues that judges should invalidate terms in contracts of adhesion that place the risk of loss on the costlier cost-avoider or that grant an option to one of the parties to impose non-reciprocal costs on the other. It goes on to justify this rule, arguing that it minimizes both the primary and secondary costs of contracts of adhesion.

Suggested Citation

Tutt, Andrew, On the Invalidation of Terms in Contracts of Adhesion (April 6, 2013). 30 Yale J. on Reg. 439 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2246122

Andrew Tutt (Contact Author)

Independent ( email )

No Address Available

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Rank
155,919
Abstract Views
770