The Impact of Salduz in France: Making Custodial Legal Advice More Effective

92 Criminal Justice Matters 14-15 (Forthcoming)

Warwick School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/08

5 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2013  

Jacqueline Hodgson

University of Warwick - School of Law

Date Written: April 8, 2013

Abstract

Like many other jurisdictions, France was reluctant to consider the ruling in Salduz v Turkey (2008) as applicable to its own criminal procedure, given the regime of safeguards in place, most notably judicial supervision. However, after defence lawyers litigated successfully in the criminal and appeal courts, as well as the constitutional council (Conseil constitutionnel), in 2011 France was finally obliged to make provision, for the first time, for lawyers to be present during the police interrogation of suspects. This is a significant change in the pre-trial investigation regime. The public prosecutor’s responsibility to oversee the police detention and interrogation of suspects is no longer regarded as justification for the exclusion of defence lawyers from this phase of the investigation. However, although the presence of the lawyer during the garde à vue is a significant improvement to defence rights, there are still concerns that the right can be delayed and that the lawyer's role is constrained to that of passive observer.

Keywords: comparative law, French law, defence lawyers, criminal law

Suggested Citation

Hodgson, Jacqueline, The Impact of Salduz in France: Making Custodial Legal Advice More Effective (April 8, 2013). 92 Criminal Justice Matters 14-15 (Forthcoming); Warwick School of Law Research Paper No. 2013/08. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2246764

Jacqueline S. Hodgson (Contact Author)

University of Warwick - School of Law ( email )

Gibbet Hill Road
Coventry CV4 7AL, CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
02476 524163 (Phone)
02476 524105 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/staff/academic/hodgson

Paper statistics

Downloads
147
Rank
163,109
Abstract Views
512