Goodwill U: School Name Change & Trademark Law

3 IP Theory 129 (2013)

16 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2013 Last revised: 29 Jul 2013

See all articles by Alexandra J. Roberts

Alexandra J. Roberts

University of New Hampshire School of Law

Date Written: April 8, 2013

Abstract

Thousands of colleges, universities, and graduate schools have changed names at least once since they were founded, and some have changed names many times. Schools are renamed for a variety of reasons: the new name might acknowledge a major benefactor, reflect a change in the school’s status or affiliation, or serve as a component of a comprehensive rebranding initiative. Yet when an existing institution offers educational services under a new and different name, its actions beget a host of trademark issues, some of which cannot be adequately understood by analogy to traditional brand and product name changes. School name changes can confuse or deceive consumers and infringe or dilute competitor schools’ marks. Adopting a new name often necessitates that a school abandon a prior name that has acquired extensive goodwill, to the detriment of past, current, and future students. Renaming may deeply harm alumni, who serve as not only their alma maters’ consumers but, arguably, as “products” that bear the schools’ marks. This essay identifies and explores the intellectual property issues that university renaming raises and the trademark ramifications for schools, their competitors, the public, and -- most importantly -- their students and alumni.

Keywords: trademark infringement, trademark dilution, naming law, intellectual property, law & culture

Suggested Citation

Roberts, Alexandra Jane, Goodwill U: School Name Change & Trademark Law (April 8, 2013). 3 IP Theory 129 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2247114

Alexandra Jane Roberts (Contact Author)

University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )

2 White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
58
Abstract Views
718
rank
369,364
PlumX Metrics