(2013) 62 International Comparative Law Quarterly 1-30
Posted: 9 Apr 2013
Date Written: April 2013
Is legal transplant possible? The stark bipolarity of a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer attracted by such a question is much less interesting and revealing than the question: what shapes the life of legal transplants? The answer to the latter question is contingent on a wide range of variables triggered by the particular transplant; the result can occupy any point along the spectrum from faithful replication to outright rejection. This case study of the transplant of the English doctrine of undue influence into Singaporean law asks why the Singaporean courts have applied the doctrine in family guarantee cases to such divergent effect, when they profess to apply the same law. The answer owes less to grand theories than to a careful examination of the nature of the transplanted law and the relationship between the formal and informal legal orders of the originating and the recipient society raised by the particular transplant.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Chen-Wishart, Mindy, Legal Transplant of Undue Influence: Lost in Translation or a Working Misunderstanding? (April 2013). (2013) 62 International Comparative Law Quarterly 1-30; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 32/2013. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2247241