Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, Vol. 14, No. 1, February, 2013, pp. 18-24
8 Pages Posted: 13 Apr 2013 Last revised: 1 Jul 2013
Date Written: April 10, 2013
In response to the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, some legislatures are considering proposals to require all gun owners to purchase liability insurance. Although this idea is not without merit, a mandatory insurance regime could easily be designed (either deliberately or inadvertently) in a way that would unnecessarily compromise the Second Amendment rights of individuals. This article provides an analysis that could contribute to designing mandatory liability insurance laws that deserve to be upheld by the courts charged with protecting the constitutional rights of American citizens.
Keywords: accidental, Chicago, competitive pressure, Connecticut, control, D.C. v. Heller, direct government regulation, fourteenth, high-risk, law-abiding, low-risk, McDonald, malicious shootings, misuse, Newtown, possession, public safety, sale, self defense, substantial relationship, tort, Supreme Court
JEL Classification: G22, K13, K14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Gilles, Stephen G. and Lund, Nelson, Mandatory Liability Insurance for Firearm Owners: Design Choices and Second Amendment Limits (April 10, 2013). Engage: The Journal of the Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, Vol. 14, No. 1, February, 2013, pp. 18-24; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-26. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2248133