22 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2013 Last revised: 28 Jun 2013
Date Written: 2013
This article challenges the constitutionality of California’s physician-only abortion restriction under the state constitution and argues that the state has no compelling interest that justifies prohibiting qualified, licensed clinicians from providing first trimester aspiration abortions, by drawing on examples and studies from other states and the results of a major study from UCSF.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Dunn, Jennifer and Parham, Lindsay, After the Choice: Challenging California's Physician-Only Abortion Restriction Under the State Constitution (2013). 61 UCLA Law Review Discourse 22, 2013; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 31. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2249418