The Paradox of Liquidity
45 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2000 Last revised: 23 Jul 2022
Date Written: June 1995
Abstract
The more liquid a company's assets, the greater their value in a short-notice liquidation. Liquid assets are generally viewed as increasing debt capacity, other things being equal. This paper focusses on the dark side of liquidity: greater liquidity reduces the ability of borrowers to commit to a specific course of action. It examines the effects of differences in asset liquidity on debt capacity. It suggests an alternative theory of financial intermediation and disintermediation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Theory of Debt Based on the Inalienability of Human Capital
By Oliver Hart and John Moore
-
Private and Public Supply of Liquidity
By Bengt R. Holmström and Jean Tirole
-
Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking
-
Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking
-
Banks as Liquidity Providers: an Explanation for the Co-Existence of Lending and Deposit-Taking
By Anil K. Kashyap, Raghuram G. Rajan, ...
-
Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Co-Existence of Lending and Deposit-Taking
By Anil K. Kashyap, Raghuram G. Rajan, ...