Facebook Used Takedown and it Was Super Effective - Finding a Framework for Protecting User Rights of Expression on Social Networking Sites

64 Pages Posted: 16 Apr 2013  

Kevin Park

NYU Law

Date Written: April 16, 2013

Abstract

Social networking sites, such as Facebook, have become integral components of modern society. They serve not only as a platform of social communication, but also as a forum for commercial and political interactions. Yet social networking sites engage in unchecked acts of censorship when they take down content posted by users or delete user accounts. Users might expect the First Amendment to apply to protect their speech. However, First Amendment protections are not likely to actually apply in this context because of threshold hurdles, such as the state action requirement. As such, this Note suggests that consumer protection rationales can provide an alternative framework for limiting the censorial power of social networking sites.

Keywords: First Amendment, censorship, social networking sites, consumer protection, Facebook, Twitter

Suggested Citation

Park, Kevin, Facebook Used Takedown and it Was Super Effective - Finding a Framework for Protecting User Rights of Expression on Social Networking Sites (April 16, 2013). NYU Annual Survey of American Law, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2252252 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2252252

Kevin Park (Contact Author)

NYU Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
Rank
222,886
Abstract Views
2,286