Trade, Spatial Separation, and the Environment
42 Pages Posted: 11 Jun 2000 Last revised: 30 Oct 2022
Date Written: August 1995
Abstract
We develop a simple two-sector dynamic model to examine the effects of international trade in the presence of pollution-created cross- sectoral production externalities. We assume that the production of 'Smokestack' manufactures generates pollution, which lowers the productivity of an environmentally sensitive sector ('Farming'). As a result, the long run production set is non-convex. Pollution provides a motive for trade, since trade can spatially separate incompatible industries. Two identical, unregulated countries will gain from trade if the share of world income spent on Smokestack is high. In contrast, when the share of world income spent on the dirty good is low, trade can usher in a negatively reinforcing process of environmental degradation and real income loss for the exporter of Smokestack.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Trade, Growth and the Environment
By Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor
-
Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect
By Arik Levinson and M. Scott Taylor
-
International Trade and the Environment: A Framework for Analysis
By Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor
-
Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis
-
Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution-Haven Hypothesis
-
Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis
By Josh Ederington and Jenny Minier
-
A Simple Model of Trade, Capital Mobility, and the Environment
By Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor
-
Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality
-
Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality