Why Have Separate Environmental Taxes?
42 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2000 Last revised: 15 Sep 2022
Date Written: December 1995
Abstract
Each environmental tax in the U.S. is designed to collect revenue for a trust fund used to clean up a particular pollution problem. Each might be intended to collect from a particular industry thought to be responsible for that pollution problem, but none represents a good example of an incentive-based tax designed to discourage the polluting activity itself. A different tax for each trust fund means that each tax rate is typically less than one percent. But each separate tax has an extra cost of administration and compliance, since taxpayers must read another set of rules and fill out another set of forms. This paper provides evidence on compliance costs that are high relative to the small revenue from each separate tax. In addition, an input-output model is used to show how current U.S. environmental tax burdens are passed from taxed industries to all other industries. Thus the extra cost incurred to administer each separate tax achieves neither targeted incentives not targeted burdens.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Don Fullerton and Gilbert E. Metcalf
-
Assessment of U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals
By Sergey Paltsev, John M. Reilly, ...
-
Lifetime Incidence and the Distributional Burden of Excise Taxes
-
By A. Lans Bovenberg, Lawrence H. Goulder, ...
-
Environmental Taxes and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: Did You Really Expect Something for Nothing?
By Don Fullerton and Gilbert E. Metcalf
-
The Incidence of a U.S. Carbon Tax: A Lifetime and Regional Analysis
By Kevin A. Hassett, Aparna Mathur, ...
-
The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Taxes
By Don Fullerton and Garth Heutel
-
The General Equilibrium Incidence of Environmental Mandates
By Don Fullerton and Garth Heutel
-
The Incidence of Pollution Control Policies
By Ian W. H. Parry, Hilary Sigman, ...