Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2255104
 


 



'Duel' Diligence: Second Thoughts About the Supremes as Sultans of Swing


Paul H. Edelman


Vanderbilt University - Law School

James Ming Chen


Michigan State University - College of Law

1996

Southern California Law Review, Vol. 70, pp. 219-238, 1996

Abstract:     
We respond to Professor Lynn A. Baker's criticisms of our article, The Most Dangerous Justice: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Mathematics. Professor Baker fundamentally misunderstands our measure of Supreme Court voting power. Moreover, she erroneously presumes that the "median Justice" wields the bulk of the Court's power. Even if there were a median Justice, it is far from clear whether he would be the Most Dangerous Justice. We conclude with a clarification of the median voter theorem and its implications for the distribution of voting power within the Supreme Court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 23, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Edelman, Paul H. and Chen, James Ming, 'Duel' Diligence: Second Thoughts About the Supremes as Sultans of Swing (1996). Southern California Law Review, Vol. 70, pp. 219-238, 1996. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2255104

Contact Information

Paul H. Edelman
Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
615-322-0990 (Phone)
615-322-6631 (Fax)

James Ming Chen (Contact Author)
Michigan State University - College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 283
Downloads: 13