Regulation Through Boilerplate: An Apologia

23 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2013 Last revised: 18 Dec 2020

See all articles by Omri Ben-Shahar

Omri Ben-Shahar

University of Chicago Law School

Date Written: April 22, 2013

Abstract

This essay reviews Margaret Jane Radin’s Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, And The Rule Of Law (Princeton Press, 2013). It responds to two of the book’s principal complaints against boilerplate consumer contracts: that they modify people’s rights without true agreement to, or even minimal knowledge of, their terms; and that the provisions they unilaterally enact are substantively intolerable. I argue, counter-intuitively, that contracts with long fine prints are no more complex and baffling to consumers than any alternative boilerplate-free templates of contracting. Therefore, there is no alternative universe in which consumers enter simpler contracts better informed of the legal terms. In addition, I argue that any policy that mandates consumer-friendlier arrangements (such as ones that eliminate boilerplate arbitration clauses, warranty disclaimers, or data collection) would hurt consumers in an unintended but potentially costly way.

Suggested Citation

Ben-Shahar, Omri, Regulation Through Boilerplate: An Apologia (April 22, 2013). Michigan Law Review 2013, University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 640, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2255161 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2255161

Omri Ben-Shahar (Contact Author)

University of Chicago Law School ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
825
Abstract Views
5,136
rank
37,197
PlumX Metrics