Regulation Through Boilerplate: An Apologia
Michigan Law Review 2013
University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 640
23 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2013 Last revised: 18 Dec 2020
Date Written: April 22, 2013
Abstract
This essay reviews Margaret Jane Radin’s Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, And The Rule Of Law (Princeton Press, 2013). It responds to two of the book’s principal complaints against boilerplate consumer contracts: that they modify people’s rights without true agreement to, or even minimal knowledge of, their terms; and that the provisions they unilaterally enact are substantively intolerable. I argue, counter-intuitively, that contracts with long fine prints are no more complex and baffling to consumers than any alternative boilerplate-free templates of contracting. Therefore, there is no alternative universe in which consumers enter simpler contracts better informed of the legal terms. In addition, I argue that any policy that mandates consumer-friendlier arrangements (such as ones that eliminate boilerplate arbitration clauses, warranty disclaimers, or data collection) would hurt consumers in an unintended but potentially costly way.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Harmonization, Preferences, and the Calculus of Consent in Commercial and Other Law
By Saul Levmore
-
Excessive Litigation by Business Users of Free Internet-Platform Services
-
Mistake Under the Common European Sales Law
By Ariel Porat
-
International Paretianism: A Defense
By Eric A. Posner and David A. Weisbach
-
International Law and the Limits of Macroeconomic Cooperation
By Eric A. Posner and Alan Sykes
-
Reverse Regulatory Arbitrage: An Auction Approach to Regulatory Assignments
By M. Todd Henderson and Frederick Tung
-
The Role of Keyword Advertising in Competition among Rival Brands
By David S. Evans and Elisa V. Mariscal