The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model of Trade: Why Does it Fail? When Does it Work?
52 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2000 Last revised: 16 Nov 2022
Date Written: June 1996
Abstract
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek model of factor service trade is a central construct in international economics. Empirically, though, it is a flop. This warrants a new approach. Using Japanese regional data we are able to test the HOV model by independently examining its component production and consumption elements. The strict HOV model performs poorly because it cannot explain the international location of production. However, relaxing the assumption of universal factor price equalization yields a dramatic improvement. We also solve most of what Trefler (1995) calls the mystery of the missing trade. In sum, the HOV model performs remarkably well.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model
-
Do Endowments Predict the Location of Production? Evidence from National and International Data
-
One Size Fits All? Heckscher-Ohlin Specialization in Global Production
-
Increasing Returns and All that: A View from Trade
By Werner Antweiler and Daniel Trefler
-
Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions
-
Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?
-
Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?