20 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2013 Last revised: 15 Jul 2013
Date Written: November 27, 2012
This paper addresses Citizens United v. FEC, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010). Part I discusses political speech within a context defined by three factors: (1) electorates that are so large that speech must address them largely by using “mass media;” (2) a postfactual culture where analysis and debate often rely on deliberate distortions, misstatements, or fabrications of factual matters; and (3) a market society where political speech depends largely upon having the financial ability to use mass media.
After discussing the legal fiction of corporate personhood, Part II argues first, that Citizens United has a reasoned basis and second, that critics allow their concern about the role of wealth in politics to divert them from addressing both the basis of the decision and other avenues of reform.
Part III discusses measures to limit the role of money in politics and the problem that, in a market society, speech will always be, to some extent, for sale.
Keywords: Citizens United, political speech, corporate speech, democracy, truthiness, post factual, corporate personhood
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hubbard, F. Patrick, Mass Democracy in a Postfactual Market Society: Citizens United and the Role of Corporate Political Speech (November 27, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2256066 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2256066